___ ___ /\__\ /\ \ /::| | /::\ \ /:|:| | /:/\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /:/ \:\ \ /:/ |:| /\__\ /:/__/ \:\__\ \/__|:|/:/ / \:\ \ /:/ / |:/:/ / \:\ /:/ / |::/ / \:\/:/ / /:/ / \::/ / \/__/ \/__/ ___ ___ ___ ___ /\ \ /\ \ ___ /\__\ /\ \ /::\ \ /::\ \ /\ \ /::| | \:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ \:\ \ /:|:| | \:\ \ /::\~\:\ \ /::\~\:\ \ /::\__\ /:/|:| |__ /::\ \ /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/\:\ \:\__\ __/:/\/__/ /:/ |:| /\__\ /:/\:\__\ \/__\:\/:/ / \/_|::\/:/ / /\/:/ / \/__|:|/:/ / /:/ \/__/ \::/ / |:|::/ / \::/__/ |:/:/ / /:/ / \/__/ |:|\/__/ \:\__\ |::/ / \/__/ |:| | \/__/ /:/ / \|__| \/__/ ___ ___ ___ /\ \ /\__\ /\__\ /::\ \ /:/ / /:/ / /:/\:\ \ /:/ / /:/ / /::\~\:\ \ /:/ / /:/ / /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/__/ /:/__/ \/__\:\/:/ / \:\ \ \:\ \ \::/ / \:\ \ \:\ \ /:/ / \:\ \ \:\ \ /:/ / \:\__\ \:\__\ \/__/ \/__/ \/__/ ___ ___ ___ /\__\ /\ \ /\ \ /::| | /::\ \ \:\ \ /:|:| | /:/\:\ \ \:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /::\~\:\ \ /::\ \ /:/ |:| /\__\ /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/\:\__\ \/__|:|/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ /:/ \/__/ |:/:/ / \:\ \:\__\ /:/ / |::/ / \:\ \/__/ \/__/ /:/ / \:\__\ \/__/ \/__/
Neen
2000 - 2004
Manetas and Mai Ueda—the first Neenster and Manetas’s then-girlfriend—picked the name Neen from a machine-generated list of words developed by Lexicon Branding, the company responsible for naming Powerbook, Pentium, Swiffer, Dasani, and other major products. Manetas had hired Lexicon to supply a name for his movement with $100,000 of support from Art Production Fund as part of a project called “Name 4 Art." Manetas announced the birth of Neen at Gagosian Gallery on May 1, 2000.
Gagosian announcement, 2000
As a word, Neen was meant to describe all artistic experience related to the computer screen. Manetas and Ueda also selected another word, Telic, which is closely related but oppositional to Neen. “Telic is [related to] the tools which help us design the world and see things in a perspective.” Neen, on the other hand, is “Telic gone nuts.”
Neen being a rather indescribable quality, many artists were Neen without knowing it. Manetas and Ueda went about identifying artists as a part of their movement, inviting them to participate in collaborative projects and stage exhibitions at their Los Angeles space, Electronic Orphanage, on Chung King Road in Chinatown. Some of the original Neen collaborators included Rafaël Rozendaal, Lev Manovich, Angelo Plessas, Andreas Angelidakis, and Nikola Tosic.
Read Domenico Quaranta’s essay about Neen and its relationship to net art.
Read a collection of interviews with Neensters published by Rhizome: Mai Ueda, Rafaël Rozendaal, Andreas Angelidakis, and Nikola Tosic.
Electronic Orphanage, Los Angeles, CA
Electronic Orphanage was a gathering place and gallery dedicated to showing computer-based artworks. The gallery’s installations were designed to mimic the experience of looking at a screen; two of the walls were painted black while an artwork was projected solely on the back wall of the room, viewable through the storefront’s window.
Other Neen exhibitions took place around the world. In 2004, Rafaël Rozendaal curated NEEN Today, an exhibition that was only open for 60 seconds at MU Artspace in Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Installation view, Neen Today, MU Artspace, 2004
Neen artists made online works such as Manetas’s jesusswimming.com and Ueda’s togetherness.org, most of which used Flash animation as their primary medium.
They also collectively staged projects that lived across mediums. Miltos Manetas claimed twenty-three U-Haul trucks would circle the Whitney Museum during the opening reception of its 2001 biennial, displaying Flash animations. No such trucks materialized, but a group of Neen artists purchased the domain whitneybiennial.com and launched a full exhibition of Neen artworks at the site.
Read “The Flash Artists who Cybersquatted the Whitney Biennial,” Lucas Pinheiro’s 2015 essay for Rhizome on whitneybiennial.com.
Neen’s posturing followed Surrealism’s nonsensicality and playfulness as well as prefigured some practices that came to be identified as “postinternet” after 2010, exploring the collapse of the digital and physical, toying with intellectual property and copyright, and subverting artists’ engagement with the institutional art world.